Swiss-based AI Governance, Risk & Compliance

AI systems under control.Globally usable. Confidential by design.

RK AI Governance supports companies using AI systems globally with practical governance, Shadow AI control, secure AI usage and EU AI Act readiness.

Individual offer after initial scoping. Pricing depends on company size, AI use, risk profile and documentation needs.

AI is already inside the business.
Governance often arrives later.

The risk is rarely one model. It is unmanaged AI usage, unclear accountability, weak documentation and sensitive data entering tools without a controlled process.

Shadow AI

Identify AI tools used outside approved processes before they create avoidable data and compliance exposure.

EU AI Act

Classify systems, map obligations and prepare documentation without legal guarantees or exaggerated claims.

Secure AI

Define rules for customer data, employee data, confidential material and AI-assisted workflows.

Business-first

Translate governance into roles, controls, policies and operating routines that teams can actually use.

A typical pattern from Swiss SME practice.

A department lead starts an AI pilot without documented risk review or approval process. At the same time, employees use AI tools in daily work without systematic management visibility. If a regulator or customer asks questions, documentation is missing — responsibility sits with those who formally signed.

AI Governance & Risk Control -
full service scope

Six service levels for diagnostics, implementation, operational control, platform risk, data & security, and regulatory case preparation.

Individual offer after initial scoping and scope analysis.

Level 1 - Diagnostics

AI Exposure & Compliance Assessment

Inventory, risk classification and regulatory baseline review

For companies that need visibility over AI usage, Shadow AI and concrete governance gaps.

Best for
Initial transparency
Deliverable
Compliance Score Report
Focus
EU AI Act Readiness
  • AI Exposure Check including Shadow AI
  • CHF 1'500–2'500, depending on company size and number of AI systems used.
  • AI Risk Classification under EU AI Act categories
  • Gap Analysis against regulatory requirements
  • Compliance Score Report with priorities
Start AI exposure check →
Level 3 - Operational Control

Ongoing Governance Control

Continuous monitoring, review of new systems and management reporting

For companies that want AI governance to remain current after implementation.

Best for
Ongoing operations
Deliverable
Quarterly Review
Focus
Continuous Compliance
  • Ongoing Compliance Monitoring
  • Review of new AI systems before implementation
  • Documentation updates when regulation changes
  • Incident Response Support
  • Quarterly reports for management
Speak with RK AI Governance →
Level 4 - Platform Risk Audit

Platform AI Governance Audit

Independent assessment of AI use, fairness and protection mechanisms on platforms

For platforms and marketplaces that need to understand AI decisions, seller/buyer impact and transparency risks.

Best for
Platform control
Deliverable
Platform Fairness Score
Focus
DSG / GDPR
  • Audit of where and how the platform uses AI
  • Shadow AI Detection on the platform side
  • DSG / GDPR Compliance Check
  • Seller & Buyer Protection Assessment
  • Pricing Transparency Review
  • Platform Fairness Score
Assess your AI risk profile →
Level 5 - Data & Security

Data Risk & Evidence Control

Data Breach Detection, AI Output Notarization and organisational vulnerability assessment

For companies that need to document compromised data, AI outputs and organisational security risks.

Best for
Data and evidence risks
Deliverable
Breach Intelligence File
Focus
Evidence Control
  • Data Breach Detection in compromised databases
  • AI Output Notarization as evidence record
  • Breach Intelligence on stolen data exposure
  • Vulnerability Assessment at organisational level
Request confidential scoping call →
Level 6 - Case & Complaint Services

Regulatory Case Preparation

Evidence files, complaint packages and structured fixation of violations

For organisations or affected parties that need regulatory complaints prepared in a structured way.

Best for
Regulatory escalation
Deliverable
Complaint Package
Focus
EDOEB / WEKO / EU DPA
  • Case File Preparation for regulatory complaints
  • Complaint Package for EDOEB, WEKO or EU DPA
  • Evidence Fixation Protocol for violations
Speak with RK AI Governance →

Local frontend prototype for first-risk orientation.

This browser-only prototype helps structure an initial AI governance profile. It does not use an API, CRM, backend, external transmission or personal-data storage.

Use this for orientation only. Final assessment requires confidential scoping and, where necessary, qualified legal review.

Local prototype only. No data is sent, stored or connected to external systems.

Discover. Classify. Design.
Implement. Monitor.

A practical governance workflow for companies that need control without unnecessary overhead.

1

Exposure

Map tools, workflows, sensitive data and Shadow AI.

2

Classification

Determine likely risk categories and documentation needs.

3

Governance design

Define roles, policies, approval paths and human oversight.

4

Implementation

Create usable controls and evidence, not shelfware.

5

Monitoring

Keep governance current as AI usage and regulation evolve.

Confidential, Swiss-based and implementation-focused.

Swiss privacy mindset

Confidentiality and careful handling of business, customer and employee data are treated as design constraints.

No invented trust claims

The site does not claim clients, certifications, partnerships or case results that are not documented.

Business-first governance

Policies are connected to how teams use AI in HR, finance, legal, customer support and decisions.

Request confidential scoping call

Tell us enough to understand your AI exposure. Individual offer after initial scoping. Pricing depends on company size, AI use, risk profile and documentation needs.

Information on this website does not constitute legal advice. Final assessment requires confidential scoping and, where necessary, qualified legal review.